88mph Insights

I thought I was buying a home but I was just buying a house

I Thought I Was Buying a Home—They Were Just Selling Me a House.

How a simple reframe can transform experience, culture, and results.

 

I thought I was buying a home.

In reality, they were just selling me a house.

I had moved to the UK just over a year earlier.
New country. New chapter.
And this wasn’t just a purchase—it was where life was going to happen next.

That might sound like semantics—but it isn’t.

A house is a product. A home is something you shape, live in, and build your life around. And when you’re making one of the biggest financial and emotional commitments of your life, that difference matters.

But very early in the process, I was reminded—more than once—that I was just buying an “off plan” house.

On the surface, that’s just a fact. 

But it’s not how it lands.

What it really communicates—subtly, but unmistakably—is this:

This isn’t special.
The house isn’t special.
And, by implication, neither are you.

You’ll take what you’re given.

And maybe that’s true from a process perspective. But this isn’t just any purchase.

For most people, this is one of the biggest decisions they will ever make. It represents aspiration, identity, security, belonging. It’s not irrational to want it to feel personal—because it is.

So, to be reminded, repeatedly, that you are simply buying off plan doesn’t ground expectations—it diminishes the experience.

It makes the house feel ordinary.

And, by extension, it makes you feel ordinary.

When the reality should be the opposite.

This should be the moment a company leans in. The moment they recognise the significance of what’s happening. The moment they make you feel like—of all the homes they’ve built—this one matters, because it’s yours.

That didn’t happen.

Instead, what followed was a process designed to deliver houses—not to help people create homes.

At the start, you’re given the impression of flexibility. Options. The ability to personalise your future home. But very quickly, you realise those choices are tightly controlled—and largely superficial.

This wasn’t a case of missed deadlines or unreasonable requests. In many instances, there was still ample time before anything had been installed. Changes hadn’t been executed. Materials hadn’t been fitted. And in every case, what I was asking for would have either saved them money—or made them more.

I asked for a plasterboard wall not to be installed. Not moved. Not redesigned. Just…not installed. It would have saved materials, saved time, reduced cost—and made a meaningful difference to how I live in the space.

The answer was no.

Not because it was too late. Not because it was too difficult.

Because it wasn’t in the plan.

That became the pattern. I asked to swap tiles—for alternatives within their own range. No. I offered to source them myself, at my own cost. No. I offered to collect them and deliver them to site. Still no.

It didn’t matter that the changes were feasible.
It didn’t matter that they fit within their own specifications.
It didn’t matter that they could increase revenue—or reduce cost.

Any deviation, however small, was treated as a problem.

Not something to solve. Something to avoid.

What made it worse was the inconsistency. Three months after we had been rushed into choosing carpets, we were told our selection was no longer available. We had to choose again.

No flexibility. No accommodation. Just expectation.

And yet when I had asked for changes earlier—many of which would have benefited them—the answer had been unwavering: no.

Flexibility clearly existed.

It just didn’t apply to me.

And that’s when it really lands.

You’re not part of the process.
You’re in the way of it.

It would be easy to blame systems, timelines, or operational constraints. But the experience makes perfect sense when you consider the underlying logic: build houses as efficiently and profitably as possible.

No company writes that down—but many behave as if it’s true.

And when that’s the operating model, everything else follows. Rigid processes. Limited flexibility. Minimal empathy.

Customers become variables to manage—not people to serve.

Now imagine if the business operated from a different belief:

We help people shape the homes they’ll build their lives around.

Or more simply:

We don’t just build houses—we help create homes.

If that were true—not as marketing, but as operating principle—everything would change.

The question wouldn’t be “has the deadline passed?”
It would be “what’s still possible?”

The default wouldn’t be no.
It would be let’s figure it out.

Because the goal wouldn’t just be to complete a house.

It would be to help someone create a home.

What’s remarkable is that this isn’t just better for the customer—it’s better for the business.

Many of the changes I requested were upgrades. They would have generated additional revenue.

But the system wasn’t designed to capture that value. It was designed to protect the process.

So it left money—and goodwill—on the table.

And over time, that compounds.

Through frustration.
Through word of mouth.
Through people choosing differently next time.

Every successful business started by solving something that genuinely mattered.

They saw something broken—and fixed it.
They saw something missing—and created it.
They did something better, in a way that people cared about.

That’s what made them successful.

That’s what made them famous.

And then, somewhere along the way, many forgot.

They replaced purpose with process.
Meaning with metrics.
Customers with throughput.

And now they wonder why work feels harder.
Why customers feel more demanding.
Why growth is more difficult.

So here’s the real question:

Do you actually know why your business exists?

What problem did you solve that made you successful in the first place?

Why did it matter?

And—more importantly—do you still solve it in a meaningful way today?

Because if you don’t, this is what happens.

People stop feeling like customers.

And start feeling like interruptions.

Buying a home should feel like the start of something meaningful.

Instead, too often, it feels like the end of a transaction.

I thought I was buying a home.

They were just selling me a house.

And that difference?

That’s the difference between a business people tolerate—

and one they choose

Mike Middleton is the founder of Marty McFly, an agency that Inspires businesses to be bravely compassionate and human so that kindness becomes the blueprint for tomorrow.